Today’s headlines aren’t all that great for the home side in the War on Terror. I have to say, the most prominent and the first of the headlines is the most worrisome. Apparently, General McChrystal isn’t all that pleased with his support from the executive branch. Not to mention the politiking of the man who should be assisting him as an equal in the Afghan war effort, Karl Eikenberry. I’m not sure why the general is surprised, the dude is a diplomat. My surprise? The article seems to paint Biden as a fool, Obama ill prepared, Eikenberry as “covering his flanks,” with the general left to figure it all out. I hope you sense the sarcasm, I’m not really surprised. Sounds like the opportunity that only a general would get.
Here’s one that’s just as interesting…..we’re training the Afghan Air Force here in the states, Lackland AFB to be exact. The only problem is, they don’t want to go back. So they don’t. Hell, would you? I’d take that free plane ticket any day. I’m sure there’s plenty of people south of the border signing up for the Afghan Air Force these days… To be honest though, this isn’t anything new. The Iraqis pulled this trick all the time. I think these politicians are just trying to get their name in the news. I’d like to see more articles on the friendship between McChrystal and Eikenberry.
Now, knowing that there are 10 random Afghans roaming America I’m sure it’s comforting to see that this American kid who tried to blow up Times Square describes himself as a “Muslim Soldier” after one trip to the Afghan region. Brilliant.
Look’s like we’ll be ready to pull out by July, 2011.
The End of Combat Operations in Iraq
So, this morning I was on FoxNews discussing what I wanted hear the President say in his speech tonight. Like I said this morning, I really wanted to hear him discuss the surge, the success it achieved in Iraq and what it means for Afghanistan. I have to admit, he gave me more than I thought he would, but, here’s what I liked and didn’t like:
Positive, he said something good about President Bush:
Hey, it’s not much, but judging by what he’s said before, I think this is a step in the right direction.
Negative, I thought this was about Iraq, not the economy:
War is expensive, and it’s not how much money we spent in Iraq, it’s the way we spent it. We threw billions of dollars into a top down, corrupt, bureaucratic system. I want to hear how you, Mr. President, are going to prevent this process from repeating itself in Afghanistan, not use it as a statement / tie-in to our economy during a speech about the end of the Iraq War.
Negative, yet somehow positive… the campaign promise:
I knew he was going to say this, but it didn’t sound as insincere and political as I thought it would (and if you saw he’s weekly address from last week, you’d know what I’m talking about).
Positive, he mentioned the surge:
Well, he mentioned it…and inferred that he’s using it because it was successful in Iraq… but, I’m still baffled why he can’t specifically say it succeeded in Iraq. Might as well do it now, you know your going to get called out on it during the debates for 2012….
Negative, counter-insurgency knowledge:
Actually, that’s not one of the lessons of this conflict. In fact, it’s the mindset we entered this conflict with. Whether we like it or not, our soldiers and Marines are our diplomats in irregular conflicts, like Iraq and Afghanistan. Nations are built from the bottom up, and if we can’t secure the populace then the foundation of these nations will never be laid, and the diplomats will have no job. The problem in Iraq today is that we created an Iraqi governing system long before we ever secured the people. Please don’t preach this as a lesson, I’d rather look to the surge and Anbar Awakening for lessons from Iraq.
Positive, he recognized the Corps:
Three out of the six battles he mentioned above, fought and won by Marines. Huge bonus points, maybe this was his way of bribing me…
Overall, I got more than I expected. I didn’t anticipate hearing Bush’s name or any mention of the surge. If the speech didn’t contain any reference to either of those two topics, it would have been a disaster. I am disappointed that he didn’t go into greater depth with the surge and how it relates to Afghanistan. In general, I would’ve liked to have seen more detail about Afghanistan. Like most speeches, this was pretty broad in scope, nothing really tangible. Not as memorable as the Oslo speech.